Chrome Split Screen vs Link Preview: Which Method is More Efficient?
When you need to view multiple web pages at the same time, which option do you choose? Chrome's native split screen feature or a link preview extension?
As a heavy browser user, I spent two weeks diving deep into both options, and I'm here to share my genuine experience.
Understanding Chrome's Split Screen Feature
How to Use Split Screen
- Open multiple tabs
- Right-click on a tab
- Select "Move tab to a new window"
- Drag the window to the edge of the screen to enable split screen
Advantages of Split Screen
- Native Support: No need to install extra plugins
- True Multitasking: Two windows run completely independently
- Keyboard Shortcuts: Quickly adjust with Win + left/right arrow keys
Limitations of Split Screen
- Complicated Setup: Requires manual dragging each time
- Low Screen Utilization: Two windows divide the screen, resulting in smaller content areas
- High Switching Costs: You have to switch focus between different windows
Experience with Link Preview
NoTab’s Preview Method
- Dragging links for a direct preview in the current page
- Adjustable preview window size and position
- Supports multiple open preview windows at the same time
Advantages of Preview
- Simple Operation: Just drag and drop
- Maximized Screen Utilization: Resize windows as needed
- Maintains Context: Operate within the original page
Limitations of Preview
- Requires Extension Installation: Not a native browser feature
- Functional Limitations: Some features might be limited within the preview window
Comparison Tests in Real Scenarios
Scenario 1: Academic Research
Task: Read a paper while checking 3 related documents
Split Screen Method:
- Main window displays the paper, split window sequentially opens documents
- Frequent switching between windows and tabs is necessary
- Time spent: about 15 minutes
Preview Method:
- Main page shows the paper, dragging links previews documents
- Multiple preview windows can be opened simultaneously for comparison
- Time spent: about 10 minutes
Result: The preview method was more efficient, reducing time by 33%.
Scenario 2: Product Research
Task: Compare features of 5 competing products
Split Screen Method:
- Requires multiple window or tab openings
- Frequent browsing switches can lead to missing information
- Heavy memory load
Preview Method:
- Directly previews product pages on the comparison table page
- Information is clear and easy to compare
- Thoughts flow better, reducing the chance of missing details
Result: The preview method vastly outperformed the split screen in information organization and comparison.
Scenario 3: News Browsing
Task: Quickly catch up on today’s hot news
Split Screen Method:
- News list and detailed content displayed in split screen
- Suitable for in-depth reading of a few articles
Preview Method:
- Quickly previews multiple articles from the list page
- Rapidly filters through content of interest
Result: The preview method is better for information filtering, while split screen is more suited for deep reading.
Performance and Resource Consumption Comparison
Chrome Split Screen
- Memory Usage: Each window consumes its own memory, which can be quite large
- CPU Usage: Multiple windows running simultaneously puts a heavy load on the processor
- Battery Consumption: Noticeable decrease in laptop battery life
Link Preview
- Memory Usage: Preview windows share resources from the main page, saving memory
- CPU Usage: Loads on-demand, resulting in a lighter processor load
- Battery Consumption: Minimal impact on battery life
Summary of Applicable Scenarios
When to Choose Split Screen
- Need to operate on two pages simultaneously for an extended period (e.g., for comparative translations)
- Frequent input between two pages
- Using a large-screen monitor (27 inches or more)
When to Choose Link Preview
- Quick information gathering and filtering
- Academic research and document review
- News browsing and content discovery
- Using a laptop or smaller screen device
Practical Tips
Hybrid Usage Strategy
- Daily Browsing: Prioritize link preview for quick information sourcing
- In-depth Work: Use split screen when needing to compare for extended periods
- Device Consideration: Use split screen on large screens, link preview on smaller ones
Tips to Boost Efficiency
- Learn Shortcuts: Speed up split screen operations
- Set Up Preview Windows Wisely: Adjust sizes based on content needs
- Build Good Habits: Close unnecessary windows promptly
Conclusion
Through practical testing, link preview proves to be more efficient than split screen in most scenarios:
- Simpler and more direct operation
- Higher screen utilization
- Lower resource consumption
- Greater adaptability
However, split screen has its unique value, especially in scenarios requiring prolonged multitasking.
Best Practice: Lean towards link preview while using split screen as a supplementary tool, flexibly choosing based on specific tasks.
For most users, installing a useful link preview extension (like NoTab) can significantly enhance browsing efficiency and reduce unnecessary window switching.
Give it a try; you might discover an entirely new browsing experience!